Embracing the Study of Paradoxes in Hydropower Dams
Law’s regulation of transboundary hydropower dams is a ﬁeld of study brimming with paradoxes. The most notable being the paradox of a hydropower dam solving one problem and creating another. From a logical perspective, such a paradox would typically be viewed as an obstacle to be avoided because it brings everything to a standstill. But from a social perspective, paradoxes are not necessarily negative, as managing them also potentially enlightens and transforms planning systems. The latter perspective, which brings to analysis a kind of dynamism, is employed in this text. In order to work out the reoccurring patterns under which law might productively make use of paradoxes, this text, therefore, proposesthe methodological tools of exposing and building upon paradoxes. Exposingparadoxes sets out to make more visible some of the unthought limitations, self-deceptions and self-contradictions which arise in modern planning practices while building upon paradoxes attempts to open up headways towards a more adequate conceptualisation of the solutions which law can offer. The overall intention here being to offer a Luhmannian-inspired theoretical framework which illuminates the value of social systems theory as a methodological tool for describing the communicative challenges facing law’s regulation of transboundary hydropower power dams.
|Author Last Names||Kang|
|Journal Name||Law Critique|
|Year of Publication||2017|
|Keywords||Hydropower dams, planning systems, paradox|
|Tweet||Paradox of a #hydropower dam: solving one problem and creating anotherhttp://waterpolicy.online/embracing-the-study-of-paradoxes-in-hydropow|